Netflix Doubles Down On Global Growth Bet, Original Content

The fourth-quarter earnings report from Netflix NFLX +17.19% signaled the video streaming service is upping its bets on international expansion and original content, at the risk of higher costs and pressured profit margins in the short term. Judging by Wednesday’s stock surge, investors are just fine with that strategy (at least for now).

Netflix leaped nearly 20% at the open, thanks in large part to better subscriber growth than Wall Street expected and the company’s plan to double down on its international growth push as its U.S. business runs into the law of large numbers. (See “Netflix Soars On Subscriber Growth.”)

More at Forbes

‘The Living Daylights’…

‘The  Living Daylights’ was the first Bond movie I watched on the big screen. Pretty early on, in the Gibraltar’s sequence, there’s special sound effect when a monkey jumps on Bond.   It was pretty good back then, it grabbed my attention, and probably my first introduction to the world cinema sound.

After a few decades, I revisited the movie in full on a blu-ray. Even now, it takes a while to get used to Timothy Dalton as James Bond. Once you do, the movie doesn’t disappoint. Spread across a multitude of locations all over the world, with a nice little love track thrown in, the movie has enough going for it, in the thrills department.

timothy

Like all Bond movies, the prelude shot on the rock of Gibraltar, hooks you on and the rest of the movie comes across at a decent pace. John Barry’s music as usual, is brilliant with the title song by A-Ha being one of the best amongs title songs.

In many ways, ‘The Living Daylights’ indicated a shift in thinking of James Bond portrayal. Interestingly this was picked up when Daniel Craig reprised the role.

Tail piece: A blogger feels that the monkey scene might have been after thought. Here is the weblink: https://operationgrandslam.wordpress.com/2014/12/30/the-living-daylights/).

‘I’…

Somewhere in the second half of the film, Vikram has to emote a variety of feelings just with his eyes. First, a tinge of anticipation mixed with a fear that his lover wouldn’t  recognize/accept him, second, a disappointment due to his lover’s aversion, third, his heightened anticipation when she calls him near her car window, fourth, his inexplicable and sorrow and finally, his sense of utter defeat before the will of God. Vikram does it all.

One has to give it to Vikram for his outstanding performance in scenes like these in the movie and his effort to get into the skin of the character. In every scene that calls for his histrionics, he delivers like no other.

If only his presence had translated into something more meaningful in terms of a wholesome movie. Instead, Director Shankar, squanders away Vikram’s accomplishments and weaves an outdated revenge fare.’ I’ is poor cousin of Director Shankar’s previous films.

  

I found the basic premise of inflicting wrong and the revenge formula around it, not enough for the story to scale.

  • What starts off an interesting aspect, that of an aspiring bodybuilder, doesn’t build into the next level.
  • The enemies the hero make, don’t look menacing enough for the hero’s fight against them. They are cliched to say the least. Other than the wrong inflicted on the hero, rest of their villainy comes across as a charade.
  • Shankar in his previous films used the cat and mouse game between hero and villain to good effect  (Gentleman, Anniyan, Indian etc). In ‘I’ the villains are more of brawn and less of brain. So, the duels between the hero and villain are less, less physical, given the deformity of hero. On top of that,  Shankar fills up the film with unnecessary stuff to make it a 3hour+ film.
  • I guess, inspired by the brawny nature of the plot, Shankar decides for an exact amount for exacting revenge, and his ‘anthaku minchi’ ends up being too fleshy and gory on screen, and with little purpose.  It’s as if he tried a blend of ‘Jeffery Archer’s novel ‘Not a penny more, Not a penny less’ and the movie  ‘Inglorious Bastards’ or ‘Django Unchained’. (I was also reminded of Pran-Jeeven scenes of  ‘Amar Akbar Anthony’)

In the end, ‘I’ ends up a movie only for die hard fans of Vikram and Shankar . It does make you wonder about the 100+crore of the budget of the film. Where did it go? Make-up? Peter Jackson’s Weta? China footage?

Tailpiece : Shankar seems to have applied logic only to the ‘amount’ of revenge and nothing else. Budget included.

Related links:

Amar Akbar Anthony Scene 1: Jeevan – Pran – Robert Mocks Kishenlals Poverty

Amar Akbar Anthony Scene 2: Pran – Kishenlal Teaches Robert A Lesson

ET, IT…and the rest