“Fargo” takes you on a riveting journey as it introduces the clash of two devils within the seemingly tranquil embrace of an idyllic town. The heart of the story rests upon the shoulders of a devil in the making, a hapless car salesman whose knack for stumbling into trouble becomes a recurring motif. With every misstep he takes, the tale delves deeper into the darker corners of his character, drawing eerie parallels to the transformation of Gollum in ‘The Lord of the Rings’.
As the plot unfolds, one cannot help but notice the impeccable craftsmanship of the Coen brothers. In an interview, they reveal their tendency to seldom offer a safe haven in their narratives, yet they make an exception in “Fargo”. The cop character and her husband form a rock-solid bond that radiates a sense of security and stability, acting as an unwavering anchor amidst the chaos. This relationship becomes the linchpin around which all things good revolve, showcasing the Coens’ ability to inject warmth and hope even into the most treacherous narratives.
The film’s brilliance lies in the stark dichotomy it presents – the clash between good and evil. This contrast serves as a canvas on which hues of complexity are painted against the backdrop of a seemingly pristine, yet gloomy, snow-covered town. The frigid landscape mirrors the chilling choices made by the characters, creating an atmosphere that is both captivating and haunting.
For avid Coen brothers’ fans, “Fargo” is an absolute must-watch. The film encapsulates their signature style, complete with dark humor, intricate characters, and a plot that constantly keeps you guessing. As the two devils dance through the snow, and the cop and her husband defy the odds, “Fargo” weaves a tale that is as captivating as it is chilling. In the end, the movie stands as a testament to the Coen brothers’ mastery in storytelling, offering an experience that is both thought-provoking and thoroughly entertaining.
Here are some different ways to build applications based on LLMs, in increasing order of cost/complexity:
Prompting. Giving a pretrained LLM instructions lets you build a prototype in minutes or hours without a training set. Earlier this year, I saw a lot of people start experimenting with prompting, and that momentum continues unabated. Several of our short courses teach best practices for this approach.
One-shot or few-shot prompting. In addition to a prompt, giving the LLM a handful of examples of how to carry out a task — the input and the desired output — sometimes yields better results.
Fine-tuning. An LLM that has been pretrained on a lot of text can be fine-tuned to your task by training it further on a small dataset of your own. The tools for fine-tuning are maturing, making it accessible to more developers.
Pretraining. Pretraining your own LLM from scratch takes a lot of resources, so very few teams do it. In addition to general-purpose models pretrained on diverse topics, this approach has led to specialized models like BloombergGPT, which knows about finance, and Med-PaLM 2, which is focused on medicine.
It’s fascinating how companies sometimes appear to be oblivious to their long-time, loyal customers. Recently, I had a firsthand encounter with this perplexing phenomenon at a Car Service Center in Secunderabad. This incident shed light on crucial aspects of management, leadership, and customer service that deserve attention and improvement. Let me take you through my journey, highlighting the lessons I’ve learned along the way.
My brother’s car, bought from this very establishment in 2012, has been a constant in our lives. Over the years, we’ve faithfully entrusted its maintenance to the same service center. With a minimum of three service visits each year, you’d think familiarity and recognition would be the norm. However, my experience was about to reveal a different reality.
I was taken aback when I walked into the service center and felt like a stranger, a complete departure from what I had anticipated. The entire process of getting my car repaired suddenly seemed foreign, and the disappointment was palpable. What struck me even more was the oversight in accessing my service history through the car’s number tag, a routine procedure that had inexplicably been missed.
Interestingly, the same establishment handled both car sales and service, as well as insurance. Despite this integrated approach, the disconnect between their offerings and the customer’s experience was startling.
The importance of punctuality in customer service cannot be overstated. However, the service center’s delayed opening made me question this fundamental principle. Despite arriving promptly at 9:15 am, the office was still settling in, prompting me to ponder whether the notion of being “open for business” was being truly honored.
To add to the complexity, the usual main contact for repairs, Mr. A, was on sick leave, leaving a rookie, Mr.B, to handle my case. This transition, though unintentional, unveiled the challenges of internal communication and training within the organization.
While waiting, I ventured into the customer lounge, only to find an ill-maintained washroom labeled “For customers only.” Ironically, it seemed to be frequented by the staff rather than the customers. This small detail exemplified a lack of attention to customer-centric details, further dampening my experience.
Initiating the claims process wasn’t any smoother. Instead of a streamlined digital process, I was handed paper forms, raising concerns about the organization’s technological readiness and willingness to adapt for customer convenience.
In the midst of this turmoil, the lack of proactive intervention from higher-ups underscored a gap in management’s responsiveness and engagement. My attempts to attract attention went unnoticed, highlighting a need for more effective internal communication and customer-centric policies.
Fortunately, an external colleague’s intervention spurred action, bringing the assurance I was seeking. This episode revealed the unfortunate reliance on external pressure to ensure timely response, casting doubt on the internal management’s commitment to customer satisfaction.
Eventually, the claims process gained momentum and reached a resolution. However, a twist awaited – Mr.B swiftly transferred responsibility back to Mr. B (which I learned when I called him for a status update), indicating a lack of consistency in service and communication. This aspect further emphasized the organization’s need for better internal management and communication practices.
Upon reflection, this experience offers valuable insights. First, being “ready for business” encompasses more than simply unlocking the doors. It means being fully prepared to serve customers efficiently and promptly, ensuring their needs are met from the moment they step in.
Secondly, the concept of a single point of contact and ownership is paramount. Empowering employees to take full responsibility and accountability can streamline processes and create a more personalized customer experience.
Lastly, customer data should be harnessed effectively. The failure to leverage this information to recognize loyal patrons and tailor services accordingly is a missed opportunity. Breaking down silos that hinder data flow within the organization is essential to making this possible.
The Car Service Center experience serves as a reminder that customer service is an ongoing journey of improvement. Organizations must constantly reassess their practices, adapt to evolving customer needs, and cultivate a culture of customer-centric management and leadership. Only then can they transform loyal customers into steadfast brand advocates.