Category Archives: ET

Taxi 9211: An actor-star duel

Ever saw a chess game played by amateurs…the way they try to make up their weak defence, by going for an early kill?
Amateaur chess players are weak in defence and ever keen to sweep the board clean. The option of a checkmate dawns on them, only when the board nears empty. They play for a kill and not for a win.

Taxi 9211 takes a similar format.
It tells the story of two characters who are blessed with a limited mental defence and a short fuse.

Jai Mittal(John Abraham) is the son of a rich guy, who just lost his golden goose(his father) and caught in the midst of a legal battle to acquire the eggs. Raghav Shastry(Nana Patekar) has never seen a golden egg..worst still, he has never heard of the story–The goose that laid golden eggs or The golden goose that laid eggs. Instead, he is out there on the streets as a taxi-driver and tries hard to steer through his mundane life.

John Abraham dresses in white, plays white and gets to make the first move.
Raghav Shastry (Nana Patekar) wears khaki and itches to take up the police work. He weilds his lathi, lashes his tongue and the game is on.

The game sets off with a bang(literally) on the bustling streets and escalates to a police station. The action reaches a crescendo when each of them occupy other’s turf–their homes.

Then the killing begins.

When both of them see enough of red, they strike an emotional chord and the game ends a draw, with both emerging as winners.

The movie takes a three act structure. The setting, the confrontation and the resolution.
The first two are decent, it is the third that takes a beating. Just as the confrontation heat is on, the movie rushes towards a climax.

So, what works for the movie? Novel canvass, Nana Patekar, Sanjay Dutt (the narrator) and the crisp editing.

What could have been better? Jai Mittal’s character, and the resolution.

Overall, the movie is worth a watch, and the Sippys should be congratulated for presenting a different fare.

One question that leaves you nagging at the end of the film–Why John Abraham? Was the budget so high (it does not appear so) that you needed star power for an assured box-office opening? And if John Abraham is a must, why not open the story with his character and unravel the other shades, not just burst out as they did, in the third act. Nana Patekar is world renowned for his throw-a-slap-in-the-face kind of roles. It is John Abraham, the star, who still needs to establish his image as an acto…so why deprive him of that chance and leave his character half-cooked.

Decoding Ron Howard

Ron Howard, the actor, had a great outing in ‘American Graffiti’. In the movie, he plays a confused teenager who gets into a mess when he takes his girl friend for granted. He sure did mend his ways in the real life:) It is a fascinating contrast to see Ron Howard, the director, respect moviegoer’s sensibilities and dish out a sumptous fare, every now and then.

With films spanning across the genres, he has etched a name for himself in the Hollywood. Most of his films though centred on family ties and the emotions that go with them, he still manages to offer a different treatment for each film. In ‘Parenthood’ he takes on Steve Martin and makes him deliver a Chaplinesque performance.  In ‘Apollo 13’ and ‘The Beautiful Mind’ he deals with two different battles–one waged in the outer space and the other in a mathematician’s mind.

You could call his liking for the human angle as his stamp. And, this stamp is obvious even in a thriller like ‘Ransom’ and  in the bio pic ‘The Cinderella Man’, where the protagonists resort to desperate and unconventional means to save their families.

Ron Howard now attempts the biggest film–and estimated budget of US$125 million–of his career, based on the best seller ‘The Da Vinci Code’.  The novel, though hugely successful, feeds very little on the relationships or family values. It would be interesting to see how he handles this extremely successful novel. Will he be true to the novel and visualize only the controversial (so called!) discoveries and the intermittent thrills, which are the main reasons for the success of the novel. Or will he steer himself through the controversies and focus on the plot, which is ain’t much in the novel. Or will he tinker with the original and play with the following of 40 million+ people who had bought the book.

Yup! It is a ‘beautiful’ problem for a creative mind:)
Let’s hope Ron Howard cracks this one.

Hues of ‘Rang De Basanti’

Rang De Basanti began its victory march in style.
The film took in Rs 22.8 crore around the world in
just four days. The winning lap still continues, the
crowds still flock to the theatres even after months
of its world wide release.Infact, Rang De Basanti emerges as the second film
this decade to cross the Rs 50-crore collection mark
in the Indian market.(Source: Business Standard).

Interestingly, it shares this honor with another period film ‘Gadar.
Both ‘Gadar’ and Rang De Basanti are products of media corporate
houses. Thankfully, for all of us, the similarties between the two
films end there.

What makes Rang De Basanti such a huge success? A success that
can measured both in terms of box-office collections, and the interest it
generated.

  • Is it Aamir Khan? (Possibly not…sure, we all remember ‘Mangal Pandey’)
  • Is it A.R.Rahman? (nope, ‘Mangal Mangal Ho’)
  • Is it Raakeysh Mehra (The shadow of ‘Aks’ still hangs in there)
  • Is it UTV (‘Swades’ and ‘Lakshya’ didn’t do well.)

All of the above? Yes, you have the reason for its success.

Lets change the order a little bit.

1) First Mr.Mehra deserves credit for making a honest, intelligent
and a clever film.

Honest, because, the film is based on the script rather than the
stars who are/would be part of it. Hence, you do not see a special
introduction song or an item song, no matter how badly the
box-office pundits want them in.

Intelligent, because the film makes you ponder on a few things just
as the protaganists did. It is only incidental that the protoganist fought
against corruption. Actually, what’s simmering inside is the hurt…the
hurt against injustice committed to the dignity of the human soul.
While the ‘Jalianwala Bagh’ did it back then, it is the MIG crash for the
lead characters now.

Clever, becaust it does not preach. The beginning, the middle and the
end are conceived from the point of view of the characters, and the
denouement of the plot ‘merely’ happens, as the characters themselves
would have taken it forward. Even when the protagonists ‘kill’, it is not
presented as THE solution. The message,if at all you could call it that way,
is ‘You sure need to act, but in your own way’

I remembered ‘To Kill a mocking bird’ and ‘The GodFather II’ while watching
this film. This is probably the biggest compliment I can pay to Mr.Mehra.

2) Prior to Rang De Basanti UTV made two films. ‘Swades’ and ‘Lakshya’.
Both enjoyed luke warm success. But it is heartening to see UTV learning
from its mistakes. There is no ‘Swades’ like brooding/preaching or a ‘Lakshya’
kind of tailor-made scenes/songs for the lead stars. UTV believed in what
they had on paper and backed Rang De Basanti to the hilt. It allocated almost
a whopping 40 per cent of its production cost of Rs 25 crore to marketing.
Rang De Basanti signals the coming-of-age for UTV.

3) After Dil Chahta Hai, Aamir Khan could do no wrong. And ‘Mangal Pandey’
came along.He is back with a bang with Rang De Basanti. He did what he
always does best–believing in script. After ‘Jo Jeeta Wohi Sikander’, his
character in Rang De Basanti is probably the best for the ‘actor’ in Aamir Khan.
The risk was so high for him, almost akin to Sunny Deol playing a ‘Gandhi’,
but Aamir thrived on it.

4) Offlate, A.R.Rahman, has been accused of delivering mediocre and
repetitive musical scores. The truth is, he heavily depends on the script and
the success of the film. His musical score unlike other composers does not
stand out, instead it blends with the film. All he needed was one great script
and that script to convert into a hit. Rang De Basanti provided him with both.

So, goes my reasons for success of Rang De Basanti. May be, I could also
think of another one…the mother of all reasons. It is the team work of four
stalwarts who have tasted failure…who wanted success, and wanted it bad.
And may be, may be, so did the cause against the injured human spirit.

Yes, folks! Rang De Basanti is here to stay…in spirit and as one of the best Indian films.