Category Archives: ET

The Godfather’s Machinations: An Ancient Indian Playbook for Power

image by author and google ai Studio (gemini-2.5-pro and nano banana)

The age-old Indian strategic doctrine of Sama, Dana, Bheda, and Danda—the four-fold approach to achieving one’s objectives—finds a striking, albeit darker, parallel in the reasoning and methods of Mario Puzo’s iconic character, Don Vito Corleone, and his successor, Michael, in “The Godfather.” This ancient quartet of diplomatic and political maneuvering, originating from texts like Kautilya’s Arthashastra, outlines a sequential and calculated path to influence and control, a path the Corleone family navigates with chilling precision. Both philosophies fundamentally operate from a position of strength, where the availability of these four options is in itself a testament to power. The absence of these choices reveals a stark reality for those in weaker positions.

The Four Upayas: A Corleone Correlation

The four Upayas, or strategies, are traditionally employed in a successive manner, starting with the most peaceful and escalating to the most severe. The world of “The Godfather,” while brutal, is not devoid of this nuanced progression.

Sama (Conciliation and Persuasion): This is the art of gentle persuasion, reasoning, and diplomacy. Don Vito Corleone, contrary to the stereotypical image of a mob boss, often resorts to Sama as his initial approach. He is a man who prefers to “reason with people” and believes that “lawyers with their briefcases can steal more than a hundred men with guns.” His initial interactions with those who seek his help are often calm and deliberative. For instance, when the undertaker Amerigo Bonasera comes to him seeking vengeance for the assault on his daughter, Vito doesn’t immediately resort to violence. Instead, he engages in a dialogue, albeit one that subtly asserts his power and Bonasera’s lack of respect in the past. He persuades Bonasera to accept his form of justice, thereby indebting him to the Corleone family. Similarly, his dealings with the other Mafia families are often marked by attempts at negotiation and finding mutually beneficial arrangements, as seen in the initial discussions about the narcotics trade.

Dana (Gifts and Concessions): When persuasion alone is insufficient, the offer of a gift, a bribe, or a concession comes into play. In the Corleone’s world, this is the classic “offer he can’t refuse.” This isn’t just a threat; it’s often a transaction that benefits the other party, at least on the surface. When Don Corleone wants Johnny Fontane to get the lead role in a movie, his consigliere, Tom Hagen, is first sent to the studio head, Jack Woltz, with offers of friendship and solutions to his union problems. This is an attempt at a mutually beneficial arrangement. The “gift” is the Corleone family’s powerful assistance. The refusal of this “gift” then leads to a more forceful approach. The very act of doing “favors” for people is a form of Dana, creating a web of obligations that strengthens the Don’s power.

Bheda (Creating Division and Dissension): This strategy involves sowing discord and creating rifts among opponents to weaken them from within. The intricate power plays and betrayals within the Five Families of New York are a testament to the effective use of Bheda. After the attempt on his father’s life, Michael Corleone masterfully employs this tactic. He identifies the traitors within his own family and among the rival families. The famous baptism scene, where Michael orchestrates the simultaneous assassination of the heads of the other families while he stands as godfather to his nephew, is the ultimate act of Bheda. He exploits their moments of vulnerability and their internal conflicts to eliminate them all in one swift move. This also includes turning rival factions against each other, a classic maneuver to maintain dominance.

Danda (Force and Punishment): The final and most extreme measure is the use of force, punishment, and violence. This is the option of last resort when all other methods have failed. The Corleone family, despite their preference for more subtle tactics, never shies away from Danda when necessary. The horse’s head in Jack Woltz’s bed is a terrifying application of Danda after Dana was rejected. The murders of Virgil “The Turk” Sollozzo and the corrupt police captain McCluskey by Michael are acts of Danda to protect the family’s interests when negotiations and appeals to reason have failed. The ultimate message is that the Corleone family has the capacity and the will to inflict severe punishment on those who stand in their way.

The Foundation of Strength and the Peril of Limited Options

The ability to sequentially employ Sama, Dana, Bheda, and Danda is a clear indication of a position of strength. Having these four options at hand means possessing the resources, intelligence, and power to choose the most appropriate and effective means to an end. Don Corleone’s influence is built on a foundation of wealth, political connections, and a loyal army of capos and soldiers. This allows him the luxury of starting with diplomacy and escalating only when necessary. His power is what makes his “reasonable” arguments persuasive and his “gifts” enticing.

Conversely, a lack of these options signifies weakness. A ruler in ancient India who could not offer concessions (Dana) or did not have the intelligence network to create division (Bheda) would be at a significant disadvantage. Their only recourse might be premature and potentially disastrous conflict (Danda), or complete submission.

In the world of “The Godfather,” weakness is a death sentence. Characters who lack the foresight, the strength, or the options to navigate the treacherous landscape are quickly eliminated. Sonny Corleone, despite his loyalty and passion, is too impulsive and lacks the strategic patience to effectively use the four Upayas. His public outburst of anger at Sollozzo is a sign of weakness that is later exploited. Fredo Corleone’s weakness and lack of intelligence make him a liability, ultimately leading to his tragic end.

When the Corleone family is in a position of perceived weakness, such as after the assassination attempt on Vito, their options become limited. They are forced to rely more heavily on Bheda and Danda to survive and re-establish their dominance. Michael’s swift and brutal actions are a direct response to the family’s vulnerability.

In conclusion, the strategic philosophy of Sama, Dana, Bheda, and Danda provides a compelling framework for understanding the methodical and calculated approach to power employed by Mario Puzo’s Godfather. The Corleone family’s success is not merely a product of brute force, but of a sophisticated understanding of human nature and the strategic application of a range of tactics, from peaceful negotiation to ruthless violence. This approach, however, is a luxury afforded by a position of immense strength. For those without the power to choose their means, the world is a far more dangerous and limited place, a reality that both the ancient strategists and the modern dons understood all too well.

🎥 The Shape-Shifting Brilliance of Gene Hackman: A Legacy Remembered

image generated by author and ChatGPT-4o

The recent passing of Gene Hackman has left a void in the cinematic world, marking the end of an era defined by his unparalleled talent and versatility. Hackman, who died of heart disease complicated by advanced Alzheimer’s disease, was found in his Santa Fe home approximately a week after his wife, Betsy Arakawa, succumbed to hantavirus pulmonary syndrome.

Gene Hackman’s performances consistently revealed a rare quality: his ability to slip into vastly different characters without relying on major physical transformation. This subtle but powerful skill brings to mind the genius of legendary Telugu actor S. V. Ranga Rao (SVR), who could embody both a humble villager and a commanding aristocrat with nothing but a change in attire—and total conviction.

In much the same way, Hackman’s characters sprang to life through internal transformation. In “Mississippi Burning” (1988), he portrayed a relentless FBI agent navigating the racial turmoil of the segregated South. In “The French Connection” (1971), he became Popeye Doyle, a hard-nosed detective fighting drug trafficking. And in “Crimson Tide” (1995), he transformed into Captain Frank Ramsey, a seasoned commander aboard a nuclear submarine on the brink of war. Despite these drastically different roles, Hackman’s essence remained steady: commanding, convincing, and never overplayed.

🎭 A Note on Acting: SVR, Sukumar, and Subtlety

As the author of Directing Business, I often reflect on the elusive quality of great acting. Drawing from years of observation and many conversations with my father, I define a great actor as someone who brings depth to a character without needing to drastically change their physical appearance.

Courtesy: Sakshi Post

He sees parallels between Hackman and SVR garu—both actors who could seamlessly inhabit any role with minimal costume change. A torn vest turned SVR into a laborer; a silk angavastram made him a landlord. Similarly, Hackman could wear a uniform or a jacket and transform entirely, not through makeup, but sheer internalization.

I also recall being surprised when director Sukumar compared another actor—possibly Allu Arjun—to SVR garu. While I acknowledge his talent, that comparison didn’t sit well with me. True acting excellence, in my view, lies in effortless immersion, something both SVR and Hackman exemplified.

🎬 Hackman in ‘Directing Business’: Leadership on Screen

In my book Directing Business, I explored Hackman’s role in Crimson Tide to illustrate contrasting leadership styles. Captain Ramsey, portrayed by Hackman, is a traditional, instinct-driven leader whose decisive authority clashes with Denzel Washington’s rational, calculated XO, Ron Hunter. Their conflict becomes a case study in real-time crisis leadership, showcasing how personal philosophy, hierarchy, and communication can impact high-stakes decision-making.

Similarly, in Hoosiers, Hackman plays Coach Norman Dale—a man who benches his star player for insubordination. It’s a lesson in principled leadership, and one that I use to explore people management and long-term vision in teams.

These examples underline how Hackman’s screen presence and role selection offer more than entertainment—they offer teachable moments.

📚 Courtesy of MoviSvami GPT: More Hackman Lessons

Additional notes and observations curated by MoviSvami GPT reinforce Hackman’s legacy in management and leadership cinema:

  • Crimson Tide (1995) – A high-stakes lesson in command-and-control versus collaborative leadership. Watch it on Apple TV, YouTube Movies, or Google Play.
  • Hoosiers (1986) – Principles over popularity. The coach’s tough decisions reveal the long game of leadership.
  • The Practice of Management by Peter Drucker – For those inspired by Hackman’s portrayals of leadership, this book is a fitting next step. Available at Amazon India, Akshara Bookstore, and Landmark in Hyderabad.

🎞️ The Final Bow

Gene Hackman never needed to shout to command a scene. He was never flashy, never loud—but always powerful. His quiet confidence, consistency, and total commitment to every role placed him in a league of his own.

Though he has left us, his films endure as reflections of complex human behavior, timeless leadership, and understated genius. For anyone who admires the craft of acting—or the craft of leading—Hackman’s work remains an essential study.

Rest in peace, Gene Hackman.


Courtesy:
Management and Leadership filmography extracted from Directing Business by Lakshmi Narayana
Additional reflections and recommendations courtesy of MoviSvami GPT
SVR Rare Photos at Sakshi post


Birdman of Alcatraz

Source: Wikipedia

“Birdman of Alcatraz” is a 1962 biographical drama directed by John Frankenheimer, featuring Burt Lancaster in a compelling portrayal of Robert Stroud, a convicted murderer who transforms his life through an unexpected passion for ornithology. The film delves into themes of redemption, isolation, and the human capacity for change.

Lancaster’s performance is both nuanced and powerful, capturing Stroud’s complex journey from a life of violence to one of introspection and scholarly pursuit. The supporting cast, including Karl Malden as a strict prison warden and Thelma Ritter as Stroud’s mother, adds depth to the narrative, highlighting the personal relationships that influence Stroud’s transformation.

Visually, the film employs stark black-and-white cinematography, effectively conveying the bleakness of prison life while juxtaposing it with the delicate beauty of the birds that become Stroud’s salvation. Elmer Bernstein’s evocative score further enhances the emotional resonance of the story.

While the film has been lauded for its storytelling and performances, it’s worth noting that it presents a somewhat romanticized version of Stroud’s life. Some contemporaneous reviews, such as one from Variety, praised the film for bringing “a new breadth and depth to the form,” while others have pointed out that the real Stroud was a more complicated and less sympathetic figure than depicted. (Rotten Tomatoes)

image generated using DALL.E-3

Beyond its cinematic achievements, “Birdman of Alcatraz” offers valuable insights into management and leadership:

  1. Self-Improvement and Lifelong Learning: Stroud’s dedication to studying birds, even under restrictive conditions, underscores the importance of continuous learning and self-improvement. His meticulous research and published findings demonstrate that personal growth is possible, regardless of circumstances.
  2. Adaptability and Innovation: Faced with limited resources, Stroud innovates by creating homemade tools and devising unique methods to care for his birds. This resourcefulness highlights the value of adaptability and creative problem-solving in overcoming challenges.
  3. Influence through Expertise: Stroud becomes a respected authority on bird diseases, with his work recognized beyond prison walls. This illustrates how expertise and knowledge can establish credibility and influence, even in the absence of formal authority.
  4. Resilience in Adversity: Despite numerous setbacks, including the confiscation of his birds and equipment, Stroud remains resilient, continuing his work with determination. This persistence in the face of adversity is a key leadership trait.

In summary, “Birdman of Alcatraz” is a thought-provoking film that not only tells a compelling story but also imparts lessons on personal development and leadership. Its portrayal of one man’s transformation serves as a powerful reminder of the human capacity for change and the impact of perseverance and knowledge.